cua cà mau cua tươi sống cua cà mau bao nhiêu 1kg giá cua hôm nay giá cua cà mau hôm nay cua thịt cà mau cua biển cua biển cà mau cách luộc cua cà mau cua gạch cua gạch cà mau vựa cua cà mau lẩu cua cà mau giá cua thịt cà mau hôm nay giá cua gạch cà mau giá cua gạch cách hấp cua cà mau cua cốm cà mau cua hấp mua cua cà mau cua ca mau ban cua ca mau cua cà mau giá rẻ cua biển tươi cuaganic cua cua thịt cà mau cua gạch cà mau cua cà mau gần đây hải sản cà mau cua gạch son cua đầy gạch giá rẻ các loại cua ở việt nam các loại cua biển ở việt nam cua ngon cua giá rẻ cua gia re crab farming crab farming cua cà mau cua cà mau cua tươi sống cua tươi sống cua cà mau bao nhiêu 1kg giá cua hôm nay giá cua cà mau hôm nay cua thịt cà mau cua biển cua biển cà mau cách luộc cua cà mau cua gạch cua gạch cà mau vựa cua cà mau lẩu cua cà mau giá cua thịt cà mau hôm nay giá cua gạch cà mau giá cua gạch cách hấp cua cà mau cua cốm cà mau cua hấp mua cua cà mau cua ca mau ban cua ca mau cua cà mau giá rẻ cua biển tươi cuaganic cua cua thịt cà mau cua gạch cà mau cua cà mau gần đây hải sản cà mau cua gạch son cua đầy gạch giá rẻ các loại cua ở việt nam các loại cua biển ở việt nam cua ngon cua giá rẻ cua gia re crab farming crab farming cua cà mau
Skip to main content

I tasted Impossible Pork and it’s even more meat-like than Impossible Burger 2.0

Although CES is a trade show typically known for TVs, phones, and huggable robots, Impossible Foods stunned attendees in 2019 with the Impossible Burger 2.0, a plant-based ground beef alternative that looked, tasted, and even bled like the real thing. It was wild for a food product to dominate CES awards, but Impossible has leapt right over the sophomore slump with its follow-up, Impossible Pork.

Recommended Videos

We loved the Impossible Burger — we even gave it our award for Best Tech at CES — and although I went into my first taste of Impossible Pork with a little skepticism, by the time I finished my first appetizer, I was happier than a pig in mud who had just learned that he would never be ground up and deep fried.

Impossible Pork was selected by our editors as the best product in the Tech for Change category at CES 2020. Check out more of our Top Tech of CES Award winners.
Best of CES 2020 Tech for Change
CES 2020

Pork is versatile: Fry up a patty for breakfast, stuff some into a dumpling, or caramelize it and serve over rice. To debut Impossible Pork, Impossible Foods took us on a tour of Asian cuisine, serving up meatless katsu, shumai, char siu buns, meatballs, dan dan noodles, and banh mi, an international menu that showed off not just how delicious the fake pork was, but how easily it slots into any recipe.

Impossible Pork
Will Nicol / Digital Trends

Secret ingredient

Impossible’s secret ingredient, the one that made their burger “bleed” like the real thing, is  heme, an iron-rich molecule that gives meat flavor. It’s also found in plants, and by engineering it from soy, the company can replicate the taste of meat without harming a hair on a pig’s chin.

Beef trumpets its flavor through any blend of spices or condiments. Even if you overcook a burger — like so many fathers on backyard grills — it will be recognizable. Pork has a milder flavor, and so other factors, like texture, are crucial; the succulent, fatty quality can often make or break a pork dish.

The Impossible Pork perfectly emulates the velvet feel of the real thing, thanks to coconut oil. The shumai (sadly devoid of shrimp, although hopefully Impossible is working on that) arrived resting in a shallow pool of its own juices and exploded with flavor when bitten into, just as a traditional dumpling would.

Even the color of the pork was immaculate. The slice of banh mi revealed the pinkish-gray color one expects.

Having gorged myself on all the Impossible Pork hors d’oeuvres, I had no doubts about the quality of the product. In taste, texture, and appearance, it was a perfect copy of pork. Since the company’s goal is to eliminate the need for actual meat, they’re on the right track.

An issue of price

Although it’s delicious, pork, like every meat, is an environmental disaster when produced at a huge scale. Animals require large amounts of feed and water to satisfy the demand of eternally growing markets. The factories that produce a lot of that meat often spew waste into water supplies and carbon emissions into the air. The antibiotics used to keep livestock healthy are contributing to the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

If presented with the opportunity to eat an Impossible Pork dish or the real thing, free of charge, I see no reason to choose the latter. The one doubt I have about Impossible’s ability to toss the pork industry into the dustbin of history is price.

When I spoke with J. Michael Melton, Impossible’s head of culinary, in December, he told me the company’s biggest challenge was overcoming the stigma that plant-based meat can’t taste good, and Impossible Pork, like its predecessor, smashes that stigma like a tenderizing mallet. Price is another matter. Impossible Burger currently costs more than ground beef, with a 12-ounce package retailing for $8.99, and given that ground pork is pretty much the cheapest meat around (I can get a pound for $4 at my local grocery store), Impossible will need to work to make its product easy for anyone to afford.

Although the company hasn’t announced any pricing for Impossible Pork, David Lee, chief financial officer, told me that the company is confident it can compete at scale. If the planet is to survive the relentless demand for more meat, compete it must.

Follow our live blog for more CES news and announcements.

Will Nicol
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Will Nicol is a Senior Writer at Digital Trends. He covers a variety of subjects, particularly emerging technologies, movies…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more